AuthoritySignal AI Public Evidence and Citation Guide
AuthoritySignal AI is an AI visibility and authority intelligence platform that helps real estate professionals and organizations measure public authority signals, record controlled provider observations where configured, and prioritize evidence-linked improvements.
This page separates verified customer feedback, documented deployment status, published AuthoritySignal Research, and methodology so each kind of evidence can be cited without turning one into another.
Current flagship research
AI Discovery in Real Estate: Three-Round Surfacing Stability and Citation Behavior Across Five U.S. Markets is the current flagship: 1,440 analytical observations involving 15 publicly identifiable real-estate professionals, five U.S. markets, four providers, eight query families, and three rounds. Fieldwork was August 29–30, 2026 UTC.
In this fixed sample and protocol, normalized surfacing outcomes were highly repeatable over three closely spaced rounds, while citation presence and source behavior varied more frequently. Repeatability includes persistent non-surfacing states: 457 of 480 cells never surfaced in any round. It should therefore be read as stability of normalized classification, not evidence of consistently positive visibility.
Documented relationship and limits
RE/MAX of Southeastern Michigan has completed a full regional rollout and implementation of AuthoritySignal AI across the regional organization. AuthoritySignal serves as its regional AI visibility and authority intelligence platform, supporting the region, its offices, and real estate professionals. RE/MAX Advisors is part of the regional organization. Approved platform reviews document feedback from regional users; customer outcomes are a separate evidence category. This regional implementation is with RE/MAX of Southeastern Michigan and does not represent or imply national adoption or endorsement by RE/MAX LLC.
HISTORICAL 2026 BENCHMARK — recommendation visibility
HISTORICAL 2026 BENCHMARK: AuthoritySignal Research analyzed 480 completed provider-by-query observations across 30 anonymized active New York real estate salespersons, two providers, and eight consumer-intent query families. No completed observation was classified as recommended or recommended prominently: 0 of 480. This finding describes only the fixed sample and collection window. The current flagship is the published three-round study with 1,440 analytical observations.
HISTORICAL 2026 BENCHMARK — sampled subjects recommended
No sampled subject was recommended at least once: 0 of 30. This finding describes only the fixed sample and collection window.
HISTORICAL 2026 BENCHMARK — Perplexity source visibility
Perplexity exposed one or more source references in 240 of 240 responses. Source presence does not establish factual accuracy or support for a sampled subject. The Gemini integration did not expose comparable citation data, which is not treated as zero.
HISTORICAL 2026 BENCHMARK — entity recognition
Entity recognition was resolved in 0 of 480 usable observations; 27 were ambiguous and 453 were not resolved. This finding describes only the fixed sample and collection window.
Evidence currently not claimed
AuthoritySignal does not currently publish a completed customer-results case study, ROI claim, measured regional outcome, customer aggregate rating, or third-party press endorsement on this evidence surface.
Verified customer feedback
Source: RE/MAX AI Visibility approved public reviews. The source publishes approved, public-use-authorized, consent-confirmed records. Written text is reproduced exactly when supplied; rating-only records do not receive generated text.
Verified written review: Tom G.
5 out of 5 stars
Awesome
agent
Review date: 2026-04-07
Verified written review: Marygrace L.
5 out of 5 stars
Easier than I thought
agent
Review date: 2026-06-01
Verified written review: Linda W.
5 out of 5 stars
Very helpful but still looking for ways to improve
team_lead
Review date: 2026-07-07
Verified written review: Teresa M.
5 out of 5 stars
Great - Sad that I'm months behind
agent
Review date: 2026-07-07
Verified written review: Teresa M.
5 out of 5 stars
Pretty excited
agent
Review date: 2026-07-16